PUBLIC STANDARD VERSION 1.1

The evidence standard for Forward Deployed Engineers.

The FDE role combines technical execution with customer-facing judgment. This rubric makes the bar visible: seven dimensions, two cores, and one rule—no assessment claim without evidence.

07Dimensions
02Core profiles
01Evidence rule

THE STANDARD IN ONE LINE

Can you build the system, explain the decision, own the outcome, and respond when the happy path breaks?

HOW TO READ THE RUBRIC

Two cores.
One multiplier.

A strong FDE is not the average of a builder and a communicator. The standard looks for credible strength in both—and the drive to keep growing.

01 / EXECUTIONAL

Can they build and own the work?

Technical execution, production ownership, and learning velocity show whether a candidate can turn an ambiguous problem into a working system.

DIMENSIONS 01 · 04 · 06
02 / JUDGMENT

Can they own the client-facing decision?

Communication, context extraction, and judgment show whether a candidate can find the right problem and earn trust around the solution.

DIMENSIONS 02 · 03 · 05
03 / MULTIPLIER

Do they have the itch to do the work?

The kida is the intrinsic drive to build, learn, investigate, and remain accountable. It raises—or caps—the impact of both cores.

DIMENSION 07

THE SEVEN DIMENSIONS

Score the evidence.
Not the vocabulary.

Each dimension is evaluated on a five-point scale. Every score must be supported by something the engineer actually built, decided, explained, or learned.

01Executional core

Technical execution & AI fluency

Evidence of real work across full-stack engineering, DevOps, SRE, and AI systems—including models, tools, guardrails, evaluations, reliability, and cost.

STRONG EVIDENCE

Can explain how the system worked, what broke, and why the technical decisions were made.

02Judgment core

Communication & executive presence

Clear, structured thinking that can move between engineering detail and an outcome-first explanation for a business leader.

STRONG EVIDENCE

Can compress complexity into a conclusion, a next step, and the decision required.

03Judgment core

Context extraction & business fluency

The ability to uncover the real workflow inside partial documentation, hidden exceptions, competing goals, and organizational constraints.

STRONG EVIDENCE

Investigates before building and can reshape a workflow without ignoring the people inside it.

04Executional core

Ownership & outcome orientation

Accountability for results in production—not activity, features, or effort—and the willingness to stay on the hook when the system fails.

STRONG EVIDENCE

Speaks concretely about what shipped, what changed, and what they personally owned.

05Judgment core

Judgment

Knowing when AI is appropriate, when it is not, where a human must decide, and how the thousand unhappy paths affect the design.

STRONG EVIDENCE

Can right-size the solution and reason about risk, reliability, cost, and return.

06Executional core

Learning velocity & coachability

How quickly someone can acquire unfamiliar tools, close a skill gap, respond to feedback, and become useful in a new environment.

STRONG EVIDENCE

Shows a repeatable way of learning through building—not just consuming information.

07Multiplier

The kida & role fit

The intrinsic itch to build, investigate, and own the outcome—even when nobody has written the ticket or supplied the clean answer.

STRONG EVIDENCE

Is energized by ambiguity, customer proximity, and being accountable for what happens next.

TIER-RELATIVE WEIGHTING

Meet engineers where they are.

An Associate is evaluated for executional strength and upside. An experienced FDE is expected to carry more independent judgment. The dimensions stay the same; their emphasis changes.

DimensionAssociateExperienced
01Technical execution & AI fluency25%22%
02Communication & executive presence10%15%
03Context extraction & business fluency10%20%
04Ownership12%13%
05Judgment10%12%
06Learning velocity18%8%
07The kida & role fit15%10%

On the Associate track, context extraction and judgment are assessed as potential—not used as an unfair senior-level gate.

THE CAREER LADDER

Placement is part of the result.

010–2 years

Associate FDE

Strong executional signal, learning velocity, and kida. Executes a defined roadmap and develops the judgment core with senior support.

022–5 years

Forward Deployed Engineer

Solid across both cores. Can run a deployment with light oversight and own the system from customer context through production outcomes.

035+ years

Senior FDE / Lead

Strong technical execution, context extraction, and executive presence. Owns client judgment and leads the full engagement.

WHERE WE DRAW THE LINES

The rubric informs a human decision. It does not replace one.

01

Evidence required. No score without a specific supporting example or statement.

02

Job-related signals only. Protected attributes are never part of the assessment.

03

Tier-relative review. Candidates are assessed against the level they are ready to perform.

04

Human accountability. The system proposes; a person approves every hiring decision.

05

Private by default. Scores, evidence, transcripts, and recommendations never appear on a public profile.

USE THE STANDARD

Understand the role.
Then defend the work.